How to communicate without noise: keys to clear institutional communication.
In a saturated environment, medium-sized and small cities can gain ground if they transform their messages into something understood and trusted. This article brings together a framework, principles, examples, and metrics for moving from simply “publishing” to truly engaging and effective communication. communicate with citizen impact.
Published October 9, 2025 · Institutional Communication · Institutions

1. The noise that disconnects: why many messages don't get through
Citizens are bombarded with thousands of messages daily. In this context, communicating more doesn't equate to communicating better. Every press release, poster, or post that is unclear adds noise and erodes credibility. The alternative is communicate with meaning: fewer pieces, more useful and better aligned.
In municipalities with small teams, the competitive advantage lies in prioritizing the essentials: what do people need to understand today to perform better tomorrow? clear institutional communication Start by answering that question with facts and practical applications, not just headlines. When the message is framed from a citizen's perspective—"what's changing, why, and how it affects me"—friction decreases, understanding increases, and a positive predisposition to collaborate with the City Council is generated.
It's not about "reaching more people", it's about "making more people understand what is changing and why".
2. Trust is built on clarity: what the data says
Trust isn't decreed; it's earned. Studies of Eurobarometer They show that when public communication is perceived as “useful and understandable,” trust in local institutions improves substantially. The OECD summarizes it this way: trust grows when communication allows understand, participate and anticipate decisions that affect daily life.
Translated into municipal terms, this means: explaining the reasons and purpose behind each measure, clarifying its impact on daily life, and offering simple ways to participate or resolve doubts. Clarity transforms policies into understandable actions, resulting in less conflict and greater community collaboration.
Before publishing, test with 3–5 people outside the project. If they don't understand the message within 30 seconds, it's not ready yet.
3. Common mistakes vs. good practices
Most failures stem not from malicious intent, but from a lack of methodology and coordination. Identifying these issues helps to prioritize tasks and focus scarce resources where they will have the greatest impact.
Common mistakes
- Messages focused on political achievements, not on real benefits.
- Technical or institutional language that is not understood.
- Proliferation of channels without hierarchy or coherence.
- Reactive publications without editorial planning.
- Lack of comprehension metrics and response times.
Good practices
- Focus on everyday impacts and citizen utility.
- Clear and direct language, avoiding unnecessary acronyms.
- Prioritize 2-3 channels and maintain multi-format consistency.
- Editorial calendar connected to the municipal agenda.
- Simple indicators: comprehension, feedback, attention, and coherence.
The key change is to move from "disseminating" information to "managing effectively through communication." Communicating well means governing better: less noise, more understanding, and greater legitimacy for implementation.
4. The 5 principles of clear institutional communication
When applied consistently, these principles transform the relationship with citizens and avoid communication noise:
The five principles that sustain clarity over time.
- Context before content: It explains why it's done and who benefits before going into the details.
- Citizen language: Replace technical terms with common words and everyday examples.
- Narrative coherence: that the message “sounds” the same on the web, social media and the street.
- Evidence and data: Show how you know what you're saying, with simple and public indicators.
- Real bidirectionality: Open and manage the conversation, don't just "leave comments".
Citizen's perspective → why → how does it affect me → next steps → where to ask.
5. Real-world examples in medium and small municipalities
Clarity depends not on budget, but on approach. Recent cases demonstrate that a useful and consistent narrative improves understanding and engagement.
- Rivas VaciamadridThe project portal accompanies each investment with a brief text explaining "what it's for" and how it will be measured. The technical layer is maintained, but the initial understanding is geared towards the general public.
- Vitoria-Gasteiz: monthly sustainability newsletter that translates actions into direct benefits (shade, noise, traffic) and incorporates metrics per action, facilitating quick reading.
- Sant Boi de LlobregatIn green infrastructure projects, the narrative prioritizes well-being, health, and climate comfort; visual elements are designed to be understood, not to "show off".
- PontevedraThe mobility strategy was summarized in three verbs —“walk, breathe, live”— that facilitate memorization and neighborhood support.
What do they share? A frame Clear: Citizen-focused headline, concise and useful message, references to relevant data, and consistent wording. To see how we've applied this to urban and environmental issues, visit [website address]. Green infrastructure strategy.
6. From the cabinet to the territory: aligning messages and execution
The typical gap between areas (Communication, Urban Planning, Environment, Participation) is closed with a shared framework which dictates who says what, how, and when. Essential operational recommendations:
- Common narrative objectives: moving from “reporting on actions” to “explaining benefits and next steps”.
- Citizen language manual: live list of terms to avoid and typical reformulations.
- Unified verbal and visual identity: that the public recognizes the message even if the channel changes.
- Monthly Editorial Committee (30–40'): Align messages of the month, responsible parties, calendar, and dependencies.
- RACI single per piece: responsible party, approval, consultation and internal recipients, to avoid blockages.
1) Citizen holder; 2) Purpose; 3) How it affects me; 4) Next steps; 5) Where to ask; 6) Responsible party and date.
7. Measuring trust: indicators and best practices
Measuring isn't complex if you choose actionable and easy-to-maintain indicators. Start with a lightweight and scalable dashboard:
| Indicator | What does it tell you? | How to measure |
|---|---|---|
| Understanding the message | If the public understands the measure | Micro-surveys on web/networks (1–2 questions) |
| Constructive feedback | Tone of local conversation | Ratio of positive vs negative comments |
| Consumption of explanatory content | Interest in “how it affects me” | Visits to FAQs/guides and time on page |
| Average response time | Perception of listening and service | Citizen service registration |
| Narrative coherence | If the messages “sound” the same | Monthly internal audit by area |
Define a quarterly baseline and realistic goals (e.g., +15% comprehension; -20% response time). Review with the editorial committee which communication actions have made a difference.
If you want to implement this system practically, check out our service for Institutional communication and citizen participation. For general references, see Eurobarometer.
8. Closing and Manifesto
A clear institutional communication It's not just decoration: it's the framework that transforms policies into understandable decisions and shared actions. When we prioritize the "why" over the "what," we reduce the noise and open the door to community collaboration.
The municipalities that are progressing the fastest share a pattern: Messages designed with citizen utility in mind, consistency across channels, data to support claims, and active listening to adjust course.. With this approach, trust ceases to be an abstract aspiration and becomes a measurable asset.
If your city council wants to align its narrative and execution, start with the essentials: a guide to plain language, a monthly editorial committee, and a streamlined dashboard for understanding, response times, and consistency. With a few simple steps, done well and maintained over time, the clarity is noticeable—and so is the public.
“Clarity is not an aesthetic virtue; it is an act of respect towards the citizenry.”
Communicating well is also governing well. An administration that explains, listens, and measures is an administration that leads.
👉 Do you want to bring clarity to your institutional messages?
We'll help you build a shared narrative, simplify your language, design effective messages, and create a dashboard to measure understanding and trust. We start with the essentials and ensure they're implemented across your team.
Learn about how we work and see cases relevant to your municipality.
Would you like us to notify you when we publish new content?
We value your time. We'll only send you articles, guides, or tools that help you improve, make better decisions, or take better action.
Our practical resources and online tools
Checklist for managing green infrastructure projects
Evaluate whether your municipality has the necessary capacity to manage and coordinate infrastructure projects
Checklist for citizen communication in the environment
Check in minutes if your municipality effectively communicates its environmental initiatives and succeeds in engaging people
Checklist for green and blue infrastructure strategy
Evaluate in 2 minutes whether your municipality has the necessary foundation to advance in infrastructure
Checklist for operational models of urban green spaces
In just a few minutes, determine if your municipality has a solid operational model for management.




